New Declassified Docs Expose Another Dirty Clinton Secret

Well, well, well. That escalated quickly. Seems like a nearly endless parade of the Democrats’ utterly illegal actions are crawling out of the woodwork, otherwise known as the cookie jar of corruption.

We have Omar’s almost embarrassingly obvious self-incrimination, whose associates thought it was a wise idea to brag about breaking the law, as well as destroying the integrity of the sacred right to vote, on … Instagram. Of course, idiot, supremely envious Bloomberg is also in hot water for openly vote selling. And Hunter Biden … The name alone says enough. In his case, it is more, what hasn’t he done in terms of corruption?

While these idiots do a phenomenal job incriminating themselves, making the DoJ’s and other authorities’ jobs very easy, other Democrats are far more sinister and skilled in covering their tracks. Among all of them, Hillary ranks near the top, which is precisely what makes her legitimately frightening. Obama was bad, but Hillary is really bad; fortunately for the United States, she never assumed power in 2016, despite her best efforts to obtain it illegitimately.

Fortunately, declassification is (for now) still practiced in the United States, and Hillary will undoubtedly be furious about the latest revelations. It has been well known that Obama has engaged in egregious interference with Trump’s presidential bid in 2016; as it turns out, so was Hillary, courtesy of a very timely, critical declassification.

More specifically, the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, sent a letter to Lindsey Graham on September 29, which detailed the rather diabolical machinations of the Clinton machine.

“In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication …

“According to his handwritten notes, former Central Intelligence Agency Director Brennan subsequently briefed President Obama and other senior national security officials on the intelligence, including the ‘alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.’” [Source: Town Hall]

Well then. Looks like Obama and Clinton can reunite after all, as long as it means destroying the integrity of the liberties that embody the exceptionalism of the United States, not to mention the will of the people in electing President Trump in the first place. Obama, predictably, just sat aside and let Hillary do her thing, just like he did in the total fiasco of Libya.

Oh, and the letter also points out James Comey’s involvement, who is perhaps the least discrete FBI representative, never mind “leader” in recent memory.

“On 07 September 2016, U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok regarding ‘U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server.’” [Source: Town Hall]

Comey has since proven himself to be a resounding phony, like his “tell-all” publication after being rightfully removed. His discretion is mesmerizing.

Always quick to lie to the media, Hillary’s camp has already raged about the report being “wrong.” Curiously, any report about Trump must be believed to the point that Democrats launch an impeachment inquiry into him over Christmas, but wise minds know that “the people” are the last concern of limousine liberals.

In a further indication of the types of people that surround Clinton, their vocabulary choice in the furious retort was less than compelling, a rather obvious byproduct of enormously overcrowded, Democrat-run schools.

“A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton told Politico that the allegations were “baseless bulls**t.” [Source: The Blaze]

Eh, ok. How eloquent. Guess that would be enough “evidence” for increasingly impressionable rioters these days.

Ultimately, Graham promised more revelations would be coming, and how correct he has proven to be so far.

Can’t wait for the next one!

Tulsi Gabbard Throws Support Behind Project Veritas

Bombshell: Commission To Change Presidential Debate Rules