Apparently, the Obamas just can’t help themselves. Between Barack and Michelle, it is difficult to say which one is the most vocal at this point in time. However, it is easy to say that both are equally destructive in terms of inflaming internal tension and stirring up racial conflicts.
The increasingly unhinged Michelle Obama is predictably ranting about the GOP’s refusal to concede the election to Biden, despite Biden himself claiming that he would not accept the election results until it was independently certified (not to mention Ms. Clinton’s insistence that Biden does not concede under any circumstances).
Nonetheless, Ms. Obama has roared onwards in her tedious attacks on Trump and the GOP, predictably using Instagram, owned by propaganda machine Facebook, as her mouthpiece.
“Our love of country requires us to respect the results of an election even when we don’t like them or wish it had gone differently—the presidency doesn’t belong to any one individual or any one party …
“To pretend that it does, to play along with these groundless conspiracy theories—whether for personal or political gain—is to put our country’s health and security in danger. This isn’t a game.” [Source: Breitbart]
Well, Ms. Obama, the presidency (and for that matter, control of information) does not belong just to the Democrats or your illustrious husband either, but both you and the fake news media seem to have conveniently forgotten that part.
As bad as Michelle’s commentary is, her husband, good old self-serving Barack, decided to go a step further and attack Americans themselves, all but directly supporting BLM, Antifa, total chaos, and above all, total disunity.
And, like the good old academic Barack is, he was sure to suffuse his vicious commentary about Americans with dramatic language designed to rev up emotions, rather than stimulate rational discussion.
Exactly how dramatic? Well, he started with “the fever of racism”, undoubtedly a pitiable correlation to COVID-19, and went off from there.
“That fever, as you said, that’s been a defining feature of a lot of our life … I think that what did happen during my presidency was yes, a backlash among some people who felt that somehow, I symbolized the possibility that they or their group were losing status not because of anything I did, but just by virtue of the fact that I didn’t look like all the other presidents previously.” [Source: Breitbart]
“…not because of anything I did.”
Talk about a glorified snowflake incapable of accepting responsibility for anything and blaming everyone else for everything. Rather clear where they adopted this attitude from, as it surely wasn’t from conservative American Patriots.
In addition, Mr. Obama, the primary thing your “presidency” symbolized the possibility of America’s future destruction. From going around the world on a pathetic apology tour, which undoubtedly empowered America’s enemies, to launching conflict after conflict in the Middle Eastern and North African regions, it is safe to say that the “backlash” you experienced was a direct result of your own tyrannical policies.
Obama decides to keep digging himself even deeper into his America-hating hole when he takes all but direct aim at the flyover states, which Ms. Clinton infamously dismissed as laden with “deplorables.”
“It would surprise me if you didn’t have a big cross-section of the country that was still carrying around a bunch of baggage and still a little disturbed by the advances that African Americans had made …
It would surprise me if changing demographics and the growing Latino population didn’t scare a certain segment of this population, just because I know enough about American history to know that that’s always been a fault line in American history.” [Source: Breitbart]
A “big cross-section of the country”.
It is safe to say that Obama is not referring to the elitist havens of the East and West coasts, the main areas he even deigns to make an appearance. And the “changing demographics” are not the issue; the “changing attitudes” towards constitutional liberties, namely freedom of speech and political expression, are.
While all of these statements are dangerously inflammatory, Obama’s most disturbing statement of all brings to mind Ms. Kamala Harris, who has all but assumed a Marxist mindset in her unstoppable quest for power.
“The issue of the particular event between the police officer and a Black person who’s interacting with them becomes the focal point, but it really raises a broader question, which is why is it that we’re still living in a society in which such inequities exist.” [Source: Breitbart]
Note: inequities. Not inequalities, but inequities.
Curiously, Ms. Harris said something nearly identical in recent times, when she proclaimed that “equity” was more important than “equality”, with “equity” representing identical outcomes (regardless of hard work, honesty, and other concepts that are foreign to the election-stealing Democrats).
Her commentaries drew sharp rebuke from Liz Cheney, who warned that Harris sounds identical to Karl Marx when making such commentaries.
Needless to say, the undereducated snowflakes likely do not know the difference between equity or equality, which is exactly why the Democrats target them the most.
Above all, it is clear that Obama retains a disproportionate influence over Ms. Harris, and one can only imagine what plans they might be concocting.
Hopefully, Trump’s suits against states for their blatant corruption in the election process will keep steamrolling forward, obviating the opportunity for Obama to meddle (again) in the United States’ affairs.
After all, even Michelle said the presidency does not belong to one person, so why exactly is Obama still acting as though he were president?
Inquiring minds would like to know …